A practicing physician for more than 40 years and a radio talk show host for 25, Dr. Mirkin is a graduate of Harvard University and Baylor University College of Medicine. He is one of a very few doctors board-certified in four specialties: Sports Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Pediatrics and Pediatric Immunology.
He is a frequent contributor to Roadcyclist.com a bi weekly newsletter provided free to anyone who subscribes. He and his wife ride over 100 miles a week and he's over 70 years old. His website and newsletter are full of training tips that have been gleaned from sports and medicine journals. As I take my blog in a new direction, I will be referring to his research and qouting from his newsletters frequently.
In his latest newsletter he speaks about cold drinks during training. Something most of us never think about beyond preferring col cytomax to luke warm gross sports drinks.
Dear Dr. Mirkin: Does taking cold fluids improve exercise performance in hot weather?
Yes; drinking cold fluids lowers body temperature. More than 70 percent of the calories that you use to convert food to energy are lost as heat. So the more intensely you exercise, the more heat you produce. A rise in body temperature slows you down because the heart has to work harder to pump extra blood from your hot muscles to your skin to dissipate the heat. Seven studies show that cold beverages lower body temperature and improve performance by an average of 10 percent.
He had a previous post about drinking colas and training which I also found interesting;
The limiting factor in endurance racing is the time that it takes to get enough oxygen into muscles to burn food for energy. Anything that reduces oxygen requirements allows you to race faster. Sugar stored in muscles, called glycogen, requires less oxygen than fat or protein. Anything that helps you keep sugar in muscles longer gives you greater endurance.
A study from Georgia State University shows that drinks that contain both glucose and fructose burn more carbohydrates than those containing only glucose, and allow cyclists to ride much faster over 60 miles (International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, April 2010).
Most soft drinks are sweetened with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS). Both HFCS and conventional sugar (sucrose) contain a mixture of two sugars, glucose and fructose, in nearly the same concentrations: HFCS has 55 percent fructose/42 percent glucose, while sucrose is a 50/50 mixture. So the relative concentrations of glucose and fructose are not significant. However, the fructose in sucrose from cane or beet sugar is bound to glucose and must first be separated from it, so it is absorbed more slowly into the bloodstream. The manufacturing process for HFCS frees the fructose from glucose to makes it into a free, unbound form that is absorbed more rapidly into the bloodstream. This could cause a higher rise in blood sugar ((Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, March 18, 2010) and provide more sugar for muscles during exercise. We need to wait for more research to know if HFCS drinks improve endurance more those made with cane or beet sugar.
Caffeine increases endurance (Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, July 2010) by increasing absorption of sugar by muscles (Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2006). Those who took sugared drinks with caffeine were able to absorb and use 26 percent more of the ingested sugar than those who took the same drinks without caffeine.
On long rides, we drink colas for their sugar and caffeine. However, you should take sugared drinks only when you exercise and for up to an hour after you finish. Contracting muscles remove sugar from the bloodstream rapidly without needing much insulin. Taking sugared drinks when you are not exercising causes higher rises in blood sugar that increase risk for diabetes and cell damage.
On a recent training ride I experimented with using half a water bottle of coke mixed with my usual peformance drink. As far as performance, I had plenty of energy that day. I found that you really had to shake the bottle before riding to flatten the carbonation but as I mentioned; there was no noticable difference in my power output and possibly I had more than usual. It's hard to tell in one ride and so further experimentation is needed and will be carried out.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Saturday, July 17, 2010
What it takes to race
What does it take to race?
Racing is the venue in which you test yourself against others who share your passion for going fast on a bike. In its simplest form it requires three things. You need to show up with a strong bike, a strong brain and a strong body.
A strong bike is not a bike that weighs so much that it handles like a tank. It is a bike that is well maintained and that will last the duration of the event. Sometimes that means spending quite a bit of money to replace parts that might be just fine but allow for that shadow of doubt as to whether or not they’ll hold up when you stand up and put all your power into the pedals. Or when that rock comes out of nowhere and strains your suspension or tires to the limits of their performance window. It means that you have evaluated the course and chosen tires that will withstand the obstacle. You’re using a tire pressure that allows for the right combination of speed and traction. It means you might replace a perfectly good chain just for the peace of mind that it gives you knowing that it will withstand all the force you demand of it. It means checking bolts and torques. I’ve seen others and experienced myself losing races because of a mechanical breakdown; which includes flat tires. I lost a race I was sure to win because one of the bolts holding my derailleur pulleys worked loose and I lost chain tension. I would never have expected that to happen. I’ve seen races in which a considerable number of people have finished with flat tires. I’ve moved up placements because others have had “mechanicals” Without a working bike you cannot bike race. Losing a race because of a foreseeable or preventable mechanical issue is your own fault and stems from laziness and a lack of maintenance. There is no excuse for this. Losing a race because of an unforeseeable mechanical issue like breaking a brand new chain or crashing onto a rock and bending your derailleur hanger or breaking a seat post is just bad luck. Even so; you have to make sure your bike is ready to go the distance.
A strong brain means you’ve ridden the course, hopefully more than once. Course knowledge is worth a couple of minutes a lap because it gives you the advantage of knowing where to push hard, where to rest and where you need to bleed of speed because of a tight corner or obstacle. It means you’re rested and alert. It means you’re quick thinking enough to find a new line on the fly. I know where the perfect line for me is in the Grand Beach rock gardens but during a race there might be someone occupying the space I want to ride through. I know where to go fast and where I have to go slow in Bur Oak but someone might be chasing me or I might be tailing someone who rides a different pace than I wish to.
I also means knowing your opponents. It means knowing who will most likely blow up, who to chase, who you can follow and when to take off on a group. It means knowing how much you have left in the tank and knowing when to drain that tank. It means knowing how hard to go off the front, when to conserve and when to put it all on the line and push yourself to your absolute maximum. A strong brain means you can watch others and gauge their fatigue by how they ride. Mistakes they make and being ready to capitalize on those mistakes.
A strong body seems self evident but it ties into having a strong brain. It’s exactly knowing when to “burn your matches” and when to conserve. It’s impersonal self evaluation. Judging your strengths and weaknesses and turning those weaknesses into strengths. It requires stepping away from your pride and ego and judging what you can do well and what you cannot do well. One of the earliest things I discovered about myself and bike racing is that I am not a strong climber. I do very poorly on steep climbs but I’ve also realized that I have considerable physical strength in my legs over short bursts. I made myself into a shallow climb specialist. Short, non steep climbs allow me to turn big gears and use my strength to close or open gaps. Steep climbs will always elude me but the more I climb the stronger I get at it. I feel strong on straight sections where I can turn up the speed but tight, twisty and technical sections also challenged my limited abilities but I practiced sections of trails that were hard for me in races and over the years I improved. I’m not nearly where my friends are in these regards but I’m not nearly as poor at them as I was. Confidence comes from practice and confidence wins races.
Most important of all though is that racing requires respect. Respect and celebration of your fellow athletes. No person ever brought accolades to themselves by sitting in the stands or standing on the sidelines. Racing is a celebration of physical endeavour. Without your foes you have no race. You need them as much as they need you. It is an honour to line up at the starting line and test yourself against them and against yourself. We must respect and honour our antagonists; for without them we have nothing.
Racing is the venue in which you test yourself against others who share your passion for going fast on a bike. In its simplest form it requires three things. You need to show up with a strong bike, a strong brain and a strong body.
A strong bike is not a bike that weighs so much that it handles like a tank. It is a bike that is well maintained and that will last the duration of the event. Sometimes that means spending quite a bit of money to replace parts that might be just fine but allow for that shadow of doubt as to whether or not they’ll hold up when you stand up and put all your power into the pedals. Or when that rock comes out of nowhere and strains your suspension or tires to the limits of their performance window. It means that you have evaluated the course and chosen tires that will withstand the obstacle. You’re using a tire pressure that allows for the right combination of speed and traction. It means you might replace a perfectly good chain just for the peace of mind that it gives you knowing that it will withstand all the force you demand of it. It means checking bolts and torques. I’ve seen others and experienced myself losing races because of a mechanical breakdown; which includes flat tires. I lost a race I was sure to win because one of the bolts holding my derailleur pulleys worked loose and I lost chain tension. I would never have expected that to happen. I’ve seen races in which a considerable number of people have finished with flat tires. I’ve moved up placements because others have had “mechanicals” Without a working bike you cannot bike race. Losing a race because of a foreseeable or preventable mechanical issue is your own fault and stems from laziness and a lack of maintenance. There is no excuse for this. Losing a race because of an unforeseeable mechanical issue like breaking a brand new chain or crashing onto a rock and bending your derailleur hanger or breaking a seat post is just bad luck. Even so; you have to make sure your bike is ready to go the distance.
A strong brain means you’ve ridden the course, hopefully more than once. Course knowledge is worth a couple of minutes a lap because it gives you the advantage of knowing where to push hard, where to rest and where you need to bleed of speed because of a tight corner or obstacle. It means you’re rested and alert. It means you’re quick thinking enough to find a new line on the fly. I know where the perfect line for me is in the Grand Beach rock gardens but during a race there might be someone occupying the space I want to ride through. I know where to go fast and where I have to go slow in Bur Oak but someone might be chasing me or I might be tailing someone who rides a different pace than I wish to.
I also means knowing your opponents. It means knowing who will most likely blow up, who to chase, who you can follow and when to take off on a group. It means knowing how much you have left in the tank and knowing when to drain that tank. It means knowing how hard to go off the front, when to conserve and when to put it all on the line and push yourself to your absolute maximum. A strong brain means you can watch others and gauge their fatigue by how they ride. Mistakes they make and being ready to capitalize on those mistakes.
A strong body seems self evident but it ties into having a strong brain. It’s exactly knowing when to “burn your matches” and when to conserve. It’s impersonal self evaluation. Judging your strengths and weaknesses and turning those weaknesses into strengths. It requires stepping away from your pride and ego and judging what you can do well and what you cannot do well. One of the earliest things I discovered about myself and bike racing is that I am not a strong climber. I do very poorly on steep climbs but I’ve also realized that I have considerable physical strength in my legs over short bursts. I made myself into a shallow climb specialist. Short, non steep climbs allow me to turn big gears and use my strength to close or open gaps. Steep climbs will always elude me but the more I climb the stronger I get at it. I feel strong on straight sections where I can turn up the speed but tight, twisty and technical sections also challenged my limited abilities but I practiced sections of trails that were hard for me in races and over the years I improved. I’m not nearly where my friends are in these regards but I’m not nearly as poor at them as I was. Confidence comes from practice and confidence wins races.
Most important of all though is that racing requires respect. Respect and celebration of your fellow athletes. No person ever brought accolades to themselves by sitting in the stands or standing on the sidelines. Racing is a celebration of physical endeavour. Without your foes you have no race. You need them as much as they need you. It is an honour to line up at the starting line and test yourself against them and against yourself. We must respect and honour our antagonists; for without them we have nothing.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Big mouth, small impact on racing. One racer's impressions of the season.
For a guy with such a big mouth, I’ve had surprisingly little to say over the summer. Since February actually. Now it’s time to unload what I’ve been storing up through the MCA XC race season with some observations, opinions and general blathering about racing.
Grand Beach;
Great race, well marked as always but I seem to recall that the prizing took an exceptionally long time. Probably the best post race food of all the races. And Olympia is always extremely generous with their prizing. Olympia is one of the, in my opinion, best race organizers in MB.
Brandon:
Once again the BBC presented us with a course that can best be described as flowy with surprises. They have some fantastic real estate to work with out there and it’s definitely worth the drive. Also well marked but the flow is interrupted by abrupt turns. The thing is though; this abruptness is there for everyone and knowing this, it is up to the racer to be prepared. Cash prizing was a nice change from shwag and this gem of a race course is rapidly rising up my list of fave’s.
Falcon:
Ok, I know that it’s a rocky course. I also know that the skies were relentless in their determination to make sure things were going to be damp for this race but what I simply cannot understand is why races are started late. Granted, the kids were out there for longer than expected but after 3 weeks of rain, it seems to me that it would have occurred to someone that maybe the race was going to be slower than normal and maybe new start times should have been posted, announced or generally made known. Racers prepare for noon starts. When the race start is constantly being pushed back, or no one seems to really know when it will start, well, it messes with our mojo. All things considered, this race started late and got later and later. It beat us up with rocks and mud and some organizational glitches. Hopefully the people in charge will learn from this year and last year and have a more authoritative approach to setting and keeping a revised start time.
Bring a Friend Birch:
My mom taught me that if I have nothing nice to say, then don’t say anything at all. With respect to my mom, I have nothing to say here.
But, because my mom doesn’t read my blog, I have a problem with this race. Yes, I do know that lightning means “no start”. Yes I do know birch is climbing. What I see as a problem is, is that there seems to be an attitude of “we have to make them suffer” approach by the organizers. A race should challenge a racer on all aspects of mtn biking but I really don’t think it’s necessary to climb incessantly just because we’re at Birch. I also think that it is completely unnecessary to make us race on fresh cut trails when there are plenty of flowy trails that connect reasonable climbs and descents. Granted, I will admit that I was still beat up from the Falcon race and a bad crash there but I still don’t think it’s necessary to have to climb as much as we did. 3 reasonable but challenging climbs spread throughout a race course is enough. Off camber fresh cut trail is unnecessary. Being told that the “friends” would start after the XC race and then suddenly rushing my friend to the start line because everything changed is unprofessional. Again, this is MY opinion but there was NOTHING about this race that would attract newcomers to the sport. If all races were run like this and were this hard, I simply wouldn’t race.
Swan River:
The only bad thing about this race is that the course is so far away. I would love to ride here more. Simply put, the Swan River crew deserve more than a simple thanks for their work. They deserve a standing ovation. No one works harder for less racers than these guys. One of the best things about Swan River is that we know exactly what we’re in for. A fast descent with a hairpin turn into a climb to separate the field heading into what is probably the sweetest single track of any race course in MB and then some tight turns and climbs to remind you of the quad bursting climb back up to the start line. In conjunction with Olympia, Swan River was also very generous with the prizing. This is how races should be run.
Grand Beach;
Great race, well marked as always but I seem to recall that the prizing took an exceptionally long time. Probably the best post race food of all the races. And Olympia is always extremely generous with their prizing. Olympia is one of the, in my opinion, best race organizers in MB.
Brandon:
Once again the BBC presented us with a course that can best be described as flowy with surprises. They have some fantastic real estate to work with out there and it’s definitely worth the drive. Also well marked but the flow is interrupted by abrupt turns. The thing is though; this abruptness is there for everyone and knowing this, it is up to the racer to be prepared. Cash prizing was a nice change from shwag and this gem of a race course is rapidly rising up my list of fave’s.
Falcon:
Ok, I know that it’s a rocky course. I also know that the skies were relentless in their determination to make sure things were going to be damp for this race but what I simply cannot understand is why races are started late. Granted, the kids were out there for longer than expected but after 3 weeks of rain, it seems to me that it would have occurred to someone that maybe the race was going to be slower than normal and maybe new start times should have been posted, announced or generally made known. Racers prepare for noon starts. When the race start is constantly being pushed back, or no one seems to really know when it will start, well, it messes with our mojo. All things considered, this race started late and got later and later. It beat us up with rocks and mud and some organizational glitches. Hopefully the people in charge will learn from this year and last year and have a more authoritative approach to setting and keeping a revised start time.
Bring a Friend Birch:
My mom taught me that if I have nothing nice to say, then don’t say anything at all. With respect to my mom, I have nothing to say here.
But, because my mom doesn’t read my blog, I have a problem with this race. Yes, I do know that lightning means “no start”. Yes I do know birch is climbing. What I see as a problem is, is that there seems to be an attitude of “we have to make them suffer” approach by the organizers. A race should challenge a racer on all aspects of mtn biking but I really don’t think it’s necessary to climb incessantly just because we’re at Birch. I also think that it is completely unnecessary to make us race on fresh cut trails when there are plenty of flowy trails that connect reasonable climbs and descents. Granted, I will admit that I was still beat up from the Falcon race and a bad crash there but I still don’t think it’s necessary to have to climb as much as we did. 3 reasonable but challenging climbs spread throughout a race course is enough. Off camber fresh cut trail is unnecessary. Being told that the “friends” would start after the XC race and then suddenly rushing my friend to the start line because everything changed is unprofessional. Again, this is MY opinion but there was NOTHING about this race that would attract newcomers to the sport. If all races were run like this and were this hard, I simply wouldn’t race.
Swan River:
The only bad thing about this race is that the course is so far away. I would love to ride here more. Simply put, the Swan River crew deserve more than a simple thanks for their work. They deserve a standing ovation. No one works harder for less racers than these guys. One of the best things about Swan River is that we know exactly what we’re in for. A fast descent with a hairpin turn into a climb to separate the field heading into what is probably the sweetest single track of any race course in MB and then some tight turns and climbs to remind you of the quad bursting climb back up to the start line. In conjunction with Olympia, Swan River was also very generous with the prizing. This is how races should be run.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Winter cycling and driver's attitudes
Several times each winter, some irate driver writes a letter to the editor of the Winnipeg Free Press complaining about people riding their bikes in winter. The letter writer usually goes on to say that it should be illegal. If you read the news online there is opportunity to leave comments and the ensuing debate is invariably polarized between the staunch drivers and the diehard cyclists. Almost always the suggestion is put forth that cyclists should be licensed, taxed and be required to carry liability insurance.
Let's examine these three suggestions:
Licensing
My first thought is "no way" but if the licensing required some kind of test that displayed a working knowledge of the rules of the road and competencies on the bike then perhaps it isn't such a bad idea. The problem, we all know, is not the 90% of cyclists who are able to manoeuvre through traffic while minimizing their effect on it, the problem is the 10% of idiots who run stop signs as if the sign isn't even there, ride all over the road, ride 2 or 3 across the road and generally ride in a manner that angers motorists and creates the angst reflected in the original letter writers complaints. I'm not for a moment suggesting that we need to ride in a timid and scaredy cat manner; I've always firmly believed that you have to ride with confidence and a little bit of attitude. I will never compromise my safety on a bike for the convenience of a driver...but if a cyclist had to prove they had competency and knowledge it would take away any defence if their actions caused an accident. The downside is that licensing a cyclist would be impossible to enforce and in that impossibility the idea loses its credibility
Taxing cyclists
This would be political suicide for any politician. We are taxed enough. Too much. And what would this tax pay for? Road maintenance? A cyclist creates no wear on a road whatsoever. Most cyclists are also motorists and we pay our road taxes when we buy gas. I would vehemently oppose any kind of a cyclist tax.
Liability Insurance
This might help a small handful of motorists who are lucky enough that a cyclist who caused an accident might stop and offer his insurance information. This cyclist lives in a magical world where it's always a downhill, tail wind riding environment with bikes that weight 10 lbs and we never get thirsty. We all win every race and Lance Armstrong is our friend.
The cyclist who's actions cause accidents are generally of the ilk that would not stop to offer assistance or information. This is the most ridiculous of all the suggestions.
I'm probably preaching to the choir here, most hard core cyclists try to have as little impact on traffic as they can while achieving their goals of riding or commuting but if or more likely when we get into a conversation with hard core drivers, having intellectual answers to their complaints will allow for a dialogue that will inform and educate drivers and perhaps soften their hatred of us. If you hear of any intellectual responses let me know because my standard response is usually;
"I'll give up my bike for the winter if you give up your car for the summer"
Let's examine these three suggestions:
Licensing
My first thought is "no way" but if the licensing required some kind of test that displayed a working knowledge of the rules of the road and competencies on the bike then perhaps it isn't such a bad idea. The problem, we all know, is not the 90% of cyclists who are able to manoeuvre through traffic while minimizing their effect on it, the problem is the 10% of idiots who run stop signs as if the sign isn't even there, ride all over the road, ride 2 or 3 across the road and generally ride in a manner that angers motorists and creates the angst reflected in the original letter writers complaints. I'm not for a moment suggesting that we need to ride in a timid and scaredy cat manner; I've always firmly believed that you have to ride with confidence and a little bit of attitude. I will never compromise my safety on a bike for the convenience of a driver...but if a cyclist had to prove they had competency and knowledge it would take away any defence if their actions caused an accident. The downside is that licensing a cyclist would be impossible to enforce and in that impossibility the idea loses its credibility
Taxing cyclists
This would be political suicide for any politician. We are taxed enough. Too much. And what would this tax pay for? Road maintenance? A cyclist creates no wear on a road whatsoever. Most cyclists are also motorists and we pay our road taxes when we buy gas. I would vehemently oppose any kind of a cyclist tax.
Liability Insurance
This might help a small handful of motorists who are lucky enough that a cyclist who caused an accident might stop and offer his insurance information. This cyclist lives in a magical world where it's always a downhill, tail wind riding environment with bikes that weight 10 lbs and we never get thirsty. We all win every race and Lance Armstrong is our friend.
The cyclist who's actions cause accidents are generally of the ilk that would not stop to offer assistance or information. This is the most ridiculous of all the suggestions.
I'm probably preaching to the choir here, most hard core cyclists try to have as little impact on traffic as they can while achieving their goals of riding or commuting but if or more likely when we get into a conversation with hard core drivers, having intellectual answers to their complaints will allow for a dialogue that will inform and educate drivers and perhaps soften their hatred of us. If you hear of any intellectual responses let me know because my standard response is usually;
"I'll give up my bike for the winter if you give up your car for the summer"
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
What is it about bikes?
I've been thinking about this lately and I wonder what it is about bikes that compels us to try to finish building up a bike that we know we won't be riding for at least a month?
I've been working on the conversion of the Nitro niner into a single speed and ordered a Shimano Alfine chain tensioner that will allow me to create a 2x1. I want to run a 44t and a 32 t chain ring with a 15t cog. Conventional tensioners don't have enough range to account for the 12t difference and even though I have no intentions of riding the bike until at least march, I wanted it finished a week ago...
Just like I've been putting air into the front tire of my Gary Fisher even though I have no intentions of riding it until at least April...
So, any thoughts as to why we work so hard on bikes we have on intentions of using?
I've been working on the conversion of the Nitro niner into a single speed and ordered a Shimano Alfine chain tensioner that will allow me to create a 2x1. I want to run a 44t and a 32 t chain ring with a 15t cog. Conventional tensioners don't have enough range to account for the 12t difference and even though I have no intentions of riding the bike until at least march, I wanted it finished a week ago...
Just like I've been putting air into the front tire of my Gary Fisher even though I have no intentions of riding it until at least April...
So, any thoughts as to why we work so hard on bikes we have on intentions of using?
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Another way of looking at things...
Drive Me Crazy
Non-cyclists are forever saying that bike riders should be held to the same standards as motorists. Agreed, but turnabout is fair play. Motorists should have to abide by the same behavior expected of cyclists. For instance:
---When drivers arrive at a stop sign or red light, they must open the door and put one foot on the ground to prove they have made a full stop.
---Cyclists who momentarily leave the bike lane to avoid an obstacle always suffer the wrath of motorists. Similarly, cars should not be permitted to change lanes in order to avoid mattresses, ladders, pedestrians and the like.
---Group rides get hassled. So should large groups of motor vehicles. Find yourself driving in a long line of cars on the highway? You're disrupting traffic for everyone behind. The cops should be able to pull you over and even confiscate your vehicle. (Might be hard to get your car in the back seat of the cruiser, but that's a detail to be worked out later.)
---Who always gets blamed in a car-bike crash? You got it. Similarly, if a larger vehicle like a dump truck collides with a car, it must be the car's fault. Because they're operating a smaller class of vehicle, car drivers de facto don't know what they're doing and must be punished.
---Cyclists are constantly being told they don't belong on the road because they don't "pay taxes" by buying gas, paying tolls, etc., even though many riders also drive -- just not at this moment. Likewise, motorists shouldn't have access to public services like police protection on the road unless they are actually paying their taxes while driving.
Copied with implied permission from the RoadBikeRider.com newsletter of Thursday December 10, 2009
Non-cyclists are forever saying that bike riders should be held to the same standards as motorists. Agreed, but turnabout is fair play. Motorists should have to abide by the same behavior expected of cyclists. For instance:
---When drivers arrive at a stop sign or red light, they must open the door and put one foot on the ground to prove they have made a full stop.
---Cyclists who momentarily leave the bike lane to avoid an obstacle always suffer the wrath of motorists. Similarly, cars should not be permitted to change lanes in order to avoid mattresses, ladders, pedestrians and the like.
---Group rides get hassled. So should large groups of motor vehicles. Find yourself driving in a long line of cars on the highway? You're disrupting traffic for everyone behind. The cops should be able to pull you over and even confiscate your vehicle. (Might be hard to get your car in the back seat of the cruiser, but that's a detail to be worked out later.)
---Who always gets blamed in a car-bike crash? You got it. Similarly, if a larger vehicle like a dump truck collides with a car, it must be the car's fault. Because they're operating a smaller class of vehicle, car drivers de facto don't know what they're doing and must be punished.
---Cyclists are constantly being told they don't belong on the road because they don't "pay taxes" by buying gas, paying tolls, etc., even though many riders also drive -- just not at this moment. Likewise, motorists shouldn't have access to public services like police protection on the road unless they are actually paying their taxes while driving.
Copied with implied permission from the RoadBikeRider.com newsletter of Thursday December 10, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
